Skip to content. Skip to navigation

FreeThink

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home The FreeThink Blog Archive 2007 July 24 The future of political debates

The future of political debates

by Mark Bell last modified Tuesday, 24 Jul, 2007 05:24
Filed Under:

America has always been somewhat ahead in utilising technology as a political tool.  Yesterday, the democratic candidates for president debated in South Carolina, with all the questions coming from videos uploaded onto the video sharing website YouTube.

The result was by far the most engaging of the presidential debates so far.

Questions ranged from extremely moving to the slightly disturbing.  Joe Biden pulled off one of the better one liners of the night in response to the latter.  'If that's his idea of a baby', the Senator quipped, 'he needs help'.  He then added that he hoped the man 'doesn't come looking for me'.

The questions added a personal touch, always clearly illustrating the human consequence of policy decisions - such as the question from a lesbian couple asking whether the candidates would allow them to marry.

Invariably though, the questioners and their videos added value to the questions they asked, leading to a debate which embodied the sort of bottom up, engaged, politics to which Greg Dyke was referring in his recent CentreForum speech.  Hopefully, by the time of the next British election, we will have caught up somewhat.

Tag cloud
Think Tanks | Opinion Polls | Devolved power | Hunting | Housing | Early years | Internet politics | Middle East | The Centreground | Women in Politics | Trident | Leadership | Defections | Nick Clegg | French elections | Next General Election | Higher Education | Youth | Foreign Policy | Military | Localism | Public Service Reform | Planning | Britain After Blair | Libertarian | right-wingers | Commentariat | Left/Right | Democracy | Prisons | John Reid | Home Office | Liberal philosophy | Licensing laws | Islam and the UK | Coalitions | Labour positioning | Local elections | Hung Parliament | Neocons | Population | Anti-social behaviour | Aspiration | Positioning | Budget | Mark Oaten | British identity | Education | Brighton Conference 2006 | Prostitution | Constitutional reform | Welfare | Cameron | Welsh politics | Legislation | Environment | Short-termism | European politics | Journalists | Drugs | Ming Campbell | Immigration | House of Lords | Iraq | Lib/Lab | Apathy | CentreForum | Lib Dem policy | Courts and the law | media ownership | Family | North/South | Rebellions | Michael Gove | Nuclear power | Child protection | American elections | David Miliband | Atlantic politics | London elections | Globalisation | Proportional Representation | Academies | Taxation | Zimbabwe | NHS | Spin | Blogging | Gordon Brown | Far right | General Election | personality politics | Inequality | Demography | Long term care | Scottish politics | Steve Webb | Lib/Con | Orange Book
Log in


Forgot your password?
New user?
Blog Roll
Liberal Review
Liberal England
Love and Liberty
Lib Dem Voice
Liberal Polemic
Alex Foster
Alan Beddow
Alex Wilcock
Anders Hanson
Andrew Garner
Andrew Lewin
Andy Mayer
Ann Garner
Blogging 4 Wycombe
Chris Black
Chris Jenkinson
Chris Jennings
David Morton
David Rundle
David Spender
Duncan Borrowman
Edis Bevan
Heather Quinton
Iain Sharpe
Ian Ridley
Jock Coats
John Hemming
Jonathan Calder
Liberal Democrat Voice
Linda Jack
Louise Alexander
Lynne Featherstone
Mark Young
Millennium Elephant
Ming Campbell
Nick Barlow
Peter Black
Peter McGrath
Peter Pigeon
Richard Baum
Richard Gadsden
Richard Thomas
Sajjad Karim
Simon Isledon
Stephen Glenn
Will Howells
Archives
Syndication
Atom
RDF
RSS 2.0
Powered by Quills